« I’m credit card debt free, finally | Main | Elizabeth Warren replies to my e-mail »

July 15, 2010

Who's right? The American Banker’s Association or The Standard & Poor’s/Experian Consumer Credit Default Index?

Who is right?

I am stumped.  Perhaps you can help me explain what seems like a contradiction. 

CNNMoney.com recently published the following headline: Credit card delinquencies fall to 8-year low.  This story is based on a report by the American Banker’s Association (ABA).  On the other hand, The New York Times published an article about how credit card default rates are still rising to record levels.  This story is based on a study completed by The Standard & Poor’s/Experian Consumer Credit Default Index. 

The ABA posits in the CNN article that “About 3.88% of bank credit card accounts were past due by 30 days or more in the first quarter of the year.”  However, The Standard & Poor’s/Experian Consumer Credit Default Index indicates, as reported by the New York Times that “In the three months through April the default rate on credit card loans had climbed to 9.14 percent, the highest since the index began to be calculated in 2004.” To be in default, an account must be at least six months behind, unless the lender has already written it off or the borrower has filed for bankruptcy.

Perhaps I am comparing apples to oranges. I can think of two reasons: 1) The ABA is looking at “bank credit card accounts”, perhaps a more restricted data set, and 2) the definitions of past due and in default differ.  But, do these reasons--and others unbeknown--adequately explain a difference of 5.26 percent?  Intuition tells me that the ABA number should be much higher, perhaps as much as double the 9.14 percentage.

I am sure that the key to resolving my confusion is a better understanding of each organization’s methodology in assessing the data.  However, the discrepancy just does not make much sense to me at all.  

What do you think?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Yes, these figures didn't make sense to me either. I think they are withholding statistics and records, which fully answers our questions.

It's also up to one's opinion and the firm's stand in interpreting the results. The figures could change as well.

That's a very interesting question. I can think of two items that could contribute to the discrepancy (although, like you, seeing their algorithm would be even more helpful)

1)Another Mark Twain quote: There are lies, d-mned lies, and statistics. Data can be formulated to create a bias that the company/organization/person wants to use to prove a point.

2) If the ABA is only looking at bank credit cards this could skew the data. Unfortunately, many consumers are duped into considering paying credit card bills on time before paying their student loans or mortgage, etc. Because credit companies are so vocal and aggressive in collections, consumers have misconceptions (i.e. a credit company can take their house) and they also want the harassing calls to stop.

In the case of a loan with collateral, this item can just be taken so the debt holder may only send a few notices and then repossess a car for example. And of course Sallie Mae has rights above any other lender to get paid on their loans (i.e. tax refund garnishments).

So, many times it's these loans that are most important that are left to wallow rather than the loans that are truly unsecured.

Education is really important in this area!

BUT- I cannot imagine this last point is the only reason the numbers are so different. It's a huge gap. So I refer back to point 1!

"Figures don't lie, but liars figure." -Mark Twain

The comments to this entry are closed.

Follow up on Twitter!





About Me

Greetings! I’m Kevin D. Johnson, a business owner who has recently assumed the role of consumer advocate and internet activist. Atlanta, Georgia is my home.

My Story

Upon returning from my wonderful honeymoon in Jamaica in October 2008, I received what I thought was an ordinary American Express bill, but to my surprise it was a disappointing letter informing me that my credit line was reduced by about 65% for a highly suspicious and discriminatory reason. Considering my excellent credit score and pristine payment history, it just didn’t make sense. However, what does make sense are the unfair and insidious policies that I have uncovered when asking why. It is time to change them.

Good Morning America tells my story.

The Goal

I created this web site to document and share my challenging journey to change what is wrong, unfair, and unjust in the credit card industry. The ultimate goal of this web site is to inform consumers of ways to stand up for themselves against treacherous business practices and to educate consumers about how to improve their credit. Finally, I hope to encourage a more open dialogue with credit card companies about their policies–good and bad.

Success

I am proud to say that this blog's unyielding demand for change led to an important amendment in the final Credit CARD Act signed by President Obama on May 22, 2009. Despite this major accomplishment, there is still more work to be done.

View video of bill hearing in Maryland

Testifying at a bill hearing in Annapolis, Maryland

Speaking Engagements

In an effort to educate as many people as possible about financial management, especially about how to manage the current credit crisis, I have begun to speak around the country at colleges, universities, corporations, chamber of commerce meetings, congressional hearings, trade organization meetings, etc. Having acquired a wealth of information that will help to empower people and to improve their financial future, I feel that sharing this information is the least I can do to make a positive impact. For information on my availability for speaking opportunities, please send an e-mail to Jennifer Silverman at jennifer@silvermanworldwide.com.


Speaking at a university

Disclaimer

All information provided on NewCreditRules.com is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute or substitute for professional financial advice. Information on NewCreditRules.com is subject to change without prior notice. Although every reasonable effort is made to present current and accurate information, NewCreditRules.com makes no guarantees of any kind. This web site may contain information that is created and maintained by a variety of sources both internal and external. These sites are unmoderated forums containing the personal opinions and other expressions of the persons who post the entries. NewCreditRules.com does not control, monitor or guarantee the information contained in these sites or information contained in links to other external web sites, and does not endorse any views expressed or products or services offered therein. In no event shall NewCreditRules.com be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods, or services available on or through any such site or resource.

Popular Posts

  1. Credit CARD Act contains amendment inspired by this campaign

  2. Bankers Vow Revenge

  3. Republicans less likely than Democrats to have too much debt?

  4. Credit card bill won't outlaw redlining

  5. Create your own data mining strategy

  6. Top 25 subprime lenders behind the mortgage meltdown

  7. President Obama’s bad idea

  8. Bank of America gets a new chairman: my good friend

  9. Should the rich pay higher interest rates?

  10. Scam alert: Avoid debt relief and credit repair firms

  11. Do you know your medFICO score?

  12. Kevin, you're "LOOKING for discrimination"

  13. Woman denied credit due to blacklisted mortgage company: Bank of America

  14. Video of Maryland bill hearing against “blacklisting”

  15. A comprehensive list of "toxic" mortgage companies

  16. Speaking engagement brings a pleasant surprise

  17. Credit card securitization encourages fee-based profit model

  18. Everything bad about the credit card industry exposed

  19. The Credit CARD Act is great, but not strong enough

  20. Companies cancel cards of responsible customers

  21. What’s your credit score, President Obama?

  22. Fair Isaac Co. will no longer sell Experian-based credit scores

  23. Why merchants suffer just as much as consumers do (Part I)

  24. Big defeat for consumers, small victory for American Express

  25. American Express says it has changed its discriminatory policy, but don't be fooled

  26. What’s your horror story? Do you have praise for a company?

  27. Beware: These stores could harm your credit! (Part II)

  28. Beware: These stores could harm your credit! (Part I)

  29. Major banks cope with shame of being on welfare

  30. What affects your credit score


Great Resources

  1. ChangeInTerms.com

  2. Complaints.com

  3. ConsumerAffairs.com

  4. Consumerist.com

  5. CreditMattersBlog.com

  6. CreditSlips.org

  7. DefendYourDollars.org

  8. Epinions.com

  9. GotaClassAction.com

  10. My3Cents.com

  11. PlanetFeedback.com

  12. RipoffReport.com
* List provided by ChangeInTerms.com.


Selected Media Coverage



Powered by Johnson Media Inc. and consumers who want to make a difference.